|
|
|
| |
|
|
. |
.
|
Over
the past several years investors saw significantly diversified
market conditions. These highly volatile markets may have
caused some jubilation when you reviewed your monthly brokerage
statements. But many long term investors spent the past
5 years cringing in fear as they opened the envelopes. And
many investors now have a drawer full of unopened envelopes
- they don't even want to look.
PTI
Securities & Futures clearly understands the struggles
facing investors today. But there are alternatives to the
full risk of long only investment strategies and our Protected
Index Program® is one of them. We
have been utilizing this investment strategy for over a
decade and our track record reflects that we have beaten
the S&P 500 during this time by upwards of 37.16%. We
have also beaten the Russell IWM by upwards of 26.88% since
its inception as well! |
What
is the key to the relative success of the Protected Index
Program? We are diversified through the use of broad market
Exchange Traded Funds, and we limit the risk of major downside
market moves.The
diversification comes by the investment in Exchange Traded
Funds (ETFs), which are comprised of large baskets of stocks.
For example, the Spyder's, or SPY's, is a trust including
all the stocks with the proper weightings of the S&P
500. The level of protection comes from always having a
long term put, or LEAP, in place limiting the risk of a
downside move in the underlying. |
|
Investment
Process & Money Management Principals |
|
| Thomas
P. Haugh |
Title:
Chief Investment Officer |
Years
With Firm: Since 1991 |
Education:
BA - Notre Dame University, MBA - University of Chicago |
Registration:
Series 3, 4, 7, 24, 53, 63 and 65 |
| Daniel
J. Haugh |
Title:
President |
Years
With Firm: Since 1991 |
Education:
BBA - Notre Dame University, MBA - DePaul
University |
Registration:
Series 3, 4, 7, 24, 27, 63 and 65 |
| Robin
Spitalny |
TItle:
Money Manager / VP New York Office |
Years
With Firm: Since 1991 |
Education:
BBA - University of Michigan, MBA - Northwestern University |
Registration:
Series 4, 7, 24, 63 and 65 |
|
|
PTI
has a strategy to achieve diversification in customer accounts
of even modest amounts through the use of exchange traded
unit investment trusts. These trusts trade like individual
stocks all day, but really are trusts containing the entire
basket of stocks making up a particular index. For example,
the SPY, or Spiders, is a basket of all the stocks making
up the S&P 500. The IWM is a basket of all the stocks
contained in the Russell 2000. In one trade we can achieve
the diversification that is otherwise very difficult to
achieve in individual customer accounts. We look to further
the diversification process by using a blend of the SPY,
IWM or other diversified ETFs. With ETFs, the exact components
are always known, and there are no hidden tax issues.
The
second issue evident by the recent stock market history
is the need for some level of protection either from general
market declines or random shocks like the events of September
11. It becomes painfully obvious by talking to wide groups
of investors that not enough analysis and hedging of market
risk was undertaken by the average investor. The question
was not asked or answered often enough “How does your
portfolio look and how would your life-style change if Cisco
was to go back to $15 per share?” Despite repetitions
of tired clichés like “I am in for the long
haul,” or “I don’t worry about the price,
I am a buy and hold guy,” most investors are not happy
with portfolio declines of much more than ten percent. |
Portfolio
Construction |
|
How
can we limit the risk of major downside moves? The development
of longer-term options, called LEAPS, has reduced the day-to-day
cost of protection due to the unique way options decline
in value over time. Options do not decay linearly, meaning
that in most situations (can be different in periods of
extreme market volatility) the further out in time an option
expiration date goes the lower its protective cost on a
daily basis. Prior to their development, the insurance costs
in terms of dollars per day for using traditional short-term
options was too excessive for continual use. The non-linear
dollar decay curve of long-term options allows the dollars
per day insurance costs to be acceptable for long-term use.
PTI firmly believes that the only way for an investor portfolio
to achieve a level of protection against extreme downside
market moves is through the purchase of put options. The
purchase of Exchange traded put options lowers the risk
of downside market moves to the amount of the premium paid
for the put plus the amount the put is out of the money
(if any). Trusting an advisor or manager to spot the bumps
in the road or general overvaluation and act in time was
always expecting too much, as recent events have clearly
shown.
The
purchase of the LEAP put, although significantly reducing
the risk of the position, does not eliminate the intial
total risk of the position. Initially, the risk of the position
is the amount paid for the put plus the amount that the
put is out of the money. Therefore, an additional part of
the PTI strategy is the sale of near-term out-of-the-money
covered call options as a way to pay for the cost of the
long-term put insurance. Out-of-the-money call options are
options written above the current price of the underlying
security. For example, if the underlying security was trading
$100, a sale of a call above $100, say the $105 calls, would
be considered out-of-the-money. The same non-linear way
that long-term options decline in value relatively slowly
causes near-term options to decay rapidly. In fact, it is
often possible and is our goal to pay for the insurance
cost long before the insurance expires.
How
is this strategy going to work, both short and long-term?
On
a long term basis, the total risk of a sample initial
position would be as follows:
Purchase of sample ETF cost per share ...........$101.00
Purchase of 2-3 year 100 put on that ETF......... $
11.00
Sale of a one month 105 call on that ETF...........$
(1.00)
Total cost per share ........................................$111.00
The long term put establishes a minimum value of the
position of $100 because of the put which is the right
to sell the stock at $100 for the life of the put. Therefore
the maximum risk of the position is established to be
$11.00 per share. This is $11 of risk for an investment
of $111 or 9.9%. This risk will vary by the option prices
at the time of investment, but can be established prior
to the investment based on the option prices at that
time. For each successive month, another call can be
sold, but no other put need be purchased for the life
of the put so each month additional call sales can lower
the total cost and therefore the risk of the position.
Future call sales can never be accurately predicted,
however we do expect to significantly reduce or hopefully
totally offset the cost of the put.
On
a short-term basis it should perform as follows:
-
The
strategy may under perform the averages (maybe significantly)
in any month where prices appreciate more than the
percentage out of the money of the calls sold. In
fact, the upside is limited to the amount of the premium
in the call sold plus the amount the call was out-of-the-money.
For example, if the underlying was trading $100 and
the $105 call was sold for $2, the maximum upside
potential would be the $2 premium plus the $5 amount
out-of-the-money ($105-100) for a total of $7.
-
The
strategy may
significantly out perform the underlying index in
rapidly decreasing markets, due to both the put protection
purchased and the call premium sold.
-
The strategy may tend to outperform the market in
times of small market movements, as the time decay
of the short call is generally greater than that of
the long put (this relationship can be affected by
general market volatility and by prices paid by the
particular put purchased or calls sold).
Sample
Portfolio Unit:
The
goal is to diversify the investment through the use of exchange
traded unit investment trusts. Currently there is an ever
increasing number of these products, but the most liquid
are the SPY, containing the stocks of the S&P 500, and
the IWM, containing the stocks of the Russell 2000. We are
also watching the growth of the Select Sector SPDRs to allow
us to over and under weight specific market sectors.
In
addition to the diversification achieved by the ETF itself,
we further that by using more than one ETF. Along with the
purchase of the ETF shares, PTI selects through its proprietary
timing model the optimum combination of long-term put insurance
and shorter-term call sale. This model takes into account
various factors, such as implied volatilities, interest
rates, recent market moves, etc. In most cases the combination
of the put and call will be selected to limit total risk
on the initial investment. As the program advances this
initial risk number will decrease as a percentage of the
initial investment.
Long
Term Objective:
On
a long-term basis we believe that this strategy will equal
or exceed the long-term return of the market averages, with
much less total risk to the portfolio and much less month
to month volatility. As such we believe this to be a competitive
core strategy for a wide range of individual and institutional
investors. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
| |
SPX |
PIP
|
| Cumulative
since inception March 1998 |
+
16.47% |
+
53.63% |
| Year-To-Date |
-
7.08% |
+
1.61% |
| 1
Month |
-
5.39% |
+
0.04% |
| 1
Year |
+
14.50% |
+
0.80% |
| 3
Year |
-
26.29% |
+
1.49% |
| 5
Year |
-
2.93% |
+
17.50% |
| 10
Year |
-
14.57% |
+
19.83% |
|
PIP
Performance indicates gains cumulative since inception of
March 1998, YTD, 1-month, 1, 3, 5, and 10-year records ending
June 30, 2010,
that the PIP produced consistent
returns in a hedged portfolio.
Supporting documentation for the performance of the PIP
program can be obtained from Dan Haugh and can be requested
by calling 800.821.4968
or by email at Dan@PTISecurities.com.
|
Performance History:
From inception of the Program
in March 1998 to mid- 2000 the market had a relatively
strong advance, topping out in August of 2000 with the
S&P up 41% since the March 1998 start. The PIP lagged
the market during this period, with a total return of
31% from March 1998 to August 2000. From that August 2000
market top the S&P sold off rather steadily and steeply
to a low in July of 2002 of minus 15.8% in the S&P,
meaning the S&P gave back the 41% it had been up and
was down an additional 15.8%. The PIP Program lost as
well, but went from a positive 31% to a positive 9%. From
that low point the S&P rallied to a high of positive
58% in October of 2007, while the PIP was up 62% from
March 1998 to the same point. Again, as expected, the
PIP lagged the S&P at a time of an extended market
advance. From that October 2007 high in the S&P, the
market had a severe sell-off to the March of 2009 lows
of minus 13%, while the PIP gave up only 13% to still
be up 49% since March of 1998. Since that low in March
2009 the S&P has staged another dramatic rally to
go from down 13% to up 23% from March 1998 to March 2010.
In that same period the PIP has actually had a negative
return, now up 52% since March 1998. What the graph shows
is as predicted, the Program under performs in periods
of rapid market advance and over performs in periods of
market declines. It also shows that there can be and has
been some extenuating market conditions (such as extreme
movements in implied volatility) that can influence the
predicted performance of the PIP vs. the S&P 500.
|
This
track record is derived from the actual returns of the largest
accounts using the S&P 500 (SPY) and reflects the return
of over 30% of the assets invested in the Protected Index
Program (PIP) using the SPY. Multiple accounts are included
in the track record to reflect the fact that any one account
may have a slightly different put or call strike (or both)
on any given month due to market conditions when the accounts
were invested. PIP returns are inclusive of all costs. This
return represents the average return achieved by amounts
invested in the S&P 500 Protected Index Program over
the time frame indicated. The return is based on cash invested
and uses no leverage or borrowed funds. For the first several
years of the track record, accounts were advised on both
a discretionary and a non-discretionary basis. Although
PTI was responsible for making investment recommendations
to non-discretionary accounts, they were free to accept,
reject or modify those recommendations and had ultimate
decision-making authority. Such decisions by the client
could have impacted the performance. Currently all accounts
included in this track record are managed by PTI. Returns
in the composite do not include the reinvestment of dividends,
interest and cash generated from covered calls writing,
and if all accounts did include reinvestments, this would
slightly increase the performance. The investment performance
of any individual portfolio may have been better or worse
over this period than the results shown herein. By presenting
the composite performance, no representation is made that
any particular portfolio or group of portfolios had precisely
this performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future
results.
PIP returns are inclusive of all costs. PTI does not charge
any management fees for PIP accounts, however, all trades
made in this program will be charged our broker assisted
commission for that trade and all of these commissions have
been included in the calculation of the track record. Click
for PIP commission rates. |
|
|
PIP
Track Record and Performance Chart (PIP vs.
IWM) |
| |
| |
| |
IWM |
PIP |
| Cumulative
since inception July 2005 |
-
4.33% |
+
22.55% |
| Year-To-Date |
-
1.85% |
-
0.10% |
| 1
Month |
-
7.33% |
-
3.01% |
| 1
Year |
+
21.53% |
+
1.67% |
| 3
Year |
-
23.65% |
+
1.96% |
|
PIP
Performance indicates gains cumulative since inception of
July 2005, YTD, 1-month, 1, and 3-year records ending June
30, 2010, that the PIP
produced consistent returns in a hedged portfolio.
Supporting documentation for the performance of the PIP
program can be obtained from Dan Haugh and can be requested
by calling 800.821.4968
or by email at Dan@PTISecurities.com. |
Performance History:
From the inception of the Russell Index
Program (IWM) in July 2005 to August 2007 the IWM had
a steady advance, with the Russell advancing 27% and the
IWM PIP advancing 24%. From that date until March 2009
the Russell had a sharp sell-off, taking the IWM from
a positive 27% to a negative 39% since July 2005. The
IWM PIP also lost ground, but remained positive 10% at
it low point in March 2009. Since that date the IWM has
rallied back strongly to be only down 1% as of February
of 2010, while the IWM PIP has rallied less strongly from
the low of March 2009 to be up 22% at the end of February
2010. Again, the program has reformed as predicted, under
performing in periods of strong market advances and over
performing in periods of market declines.
|
This
track record is derived from the actual returns of the
largest accounts using the Russell 2000 (IWM) and reflects
the return of over 25% of the assets invested in the Protected
Index Program (PIP) using the IWM. Multiple accounts are
included in the track record to reflect the fact that
any one account may have a slightly different put or call
strike (or both) on any given month due to market conditions
when the accounts were invested. PIP returns are inclusive
of all costs. This return represents the average return
achieved by amounts invested in the Russell 2000 Protected
Index Program over the time frame indicated. The return
is based on cash invested and uses no leverage or borrowed
funds. All accounts included in this track record are
managed by PTI. Returns in the composite do not include
the reinvestment of dividends, interest and cash generated
from covered calls writing, and if all accounts did include
reinvestments, this would slightly increase the performance.
The investment performance of any individual portfolio
may have been better or worse over this period than the
results shown herein. By presenting the composite performance,
no representation is made that any particular portfolio
or group of portfolios had precisely this performance.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. PIP
returns are inclusive of all costs. PTI does not charge
any management fees for PIP accounts, however, all trades
made in this program will be charged our broker assisted
commission for that trade and all of these commissions
have been included in the calculation of the track record.
Click
for PIP commission rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As
a PTI Securities & Futures client, yes, the
money remains in your account.
|
| |
| After
consultation with the client, a mutual decision will
be reached to determine which indexes to buy. |
| |
| After
consultation with the client, a decision will be reached
to determine the degree of protection desired as well
as the appropriate put strike to buy. |
| |
| There
are no management fees or inactivity fees for accounts
held at PTI Securities & Futures, just the standard
broker-assisted trading commission fees apply. See
commission rates below. |
| |
| Either
Tom Haugh or Dan Haugh will be managing your account. |
| |
| Yes,
you will be able to access your account online through
PTI's e-View system.
|
| |
| The
suggested account minimum is $75,000. |
| |
| As
long as you have an IRA account that allows protected
puts and covered calls. IRA accounts at PTI Securities
& Futures (utilizing the Delaware Charter Agreement)
may elect to utilize this management program. |
| |
| The
amount of initial risk (customized to the needs of
the individual client) is typically in the 8-12% range. |
|
Member of SIPC,
which protects securities
customers of its members up to $500,000 (including
$100,000 for claims for cash). Explanatory brochure
available upon request at www.sipc.org.
Additionally,
together with Mesirow
Financial Inc., PTI has purchased
excess SIPC coverage to insure each account
for an additional $29.5 million in securities.
Note:
SIPC does not cover commodity contract and options
on futures. SIPC does not protect against market
loss.
|
| |
Contact
Dan Haugh
toll free at 800.821.4968 to discuss
your risk profile and investment goals, then click |
 |
|
|
|
| (Broker-Assisted
Rates) |
| No
management fees. No inactivity fees. |
| Stock
& Index Options... |
$5
Per Contract |
$45.00
commission minimum |
| Stock... |
5¢
Per Share |
$45.00
commission minimum |
|
Rates
Effective 7-19-04 |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
...PTI
Securities & Futures
LP .....411 S. Wells Street, Suite
900, Chicago, IL 60607..... P. 800.821.4968
.....F. 312.663.3058 |
Options
involve risk and are not suitable for all investors.
Copyright © 2010 PTI Securities & Futures LP .|.
Member SIPC NFA
FINRA |
|